Comment: This site will really rattle the Irish Government, Church and the people as we are now no longer stand by and allow these people who have ridden roughshod over us for far too many decades now!!!

Comment: What a shame that no Group Leaders put in an appearance at the Bethany Graves in Mount Jerome Cemetery in Harold's Cross in Dublin. It might have interfered with their money making scams!!! You should all hang your heads in shame!!!!

Comment: What a good intelligent site. Hopefully it can inflict awareness as to the con-men and women who call themselves "group leaders". Angry

Comment: it is early days yet so please bear with us and we will get there together. Barry

Comment: I am glad you like it so far and will get better by the official launch date which will be soon. Barry

Comment: Hi Barry and Honora ! well, found you at last!lol.. and I must say the site is absolutely fantastic!!..is it ok if I spread the word on this yet Barry, there's a few people who will be interested. Absolutely thrilled right now! Take care everyone, Kind regards and all the best from Anne

Comment: Lunar cycles and cycles of lunacy. Pentecost has come and gone, where is the HEAD OF SEAN BAPTISTE BRADY.??. Sean tell`s us he will " resign" when the !holy father! asks him.? CLING-ON Sean, as he is now affectionately known, saddled with the self imposed title of "wounded healer" suffered the indignation of being knocked back by Oxford as being far too controversial to appear within those hallowed portal`s to deliver a speech on the popes "letter", sent by the !holy father! to Irish catholics earlier this year.

Comment: The Oxford debating Society whose alumni over the year`s have elevated these yearly debate`s to International acclaim based on controversial topic`s, have decided that Sean CLING-ON Brady was not a "suitable" candidate, and this exclusionary terminology, resulting in a refusal by Oxford to host Brady must surely be viewed as the ultimate opinion to the "wounded healer", as being unfit to engage in rational discussion , or humane explanation as to how a situation developed in Ireland resulting in the wholesale destruction of so many children`s live`s which can only be suitably described as CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. Oxford, and it`s intellectual`s dutifully saw fit to deny omnipotence to this supreme craftsman of obfuscation. Rightly so. Sean CLING-ON Brady, has by his own admission played his part which resulted in countless children being abused, and being savagely abused, sexually, by one of Ireland`s most prolific clerical sex abuser`s , Brendan Smyth.

Comment: Oxford, and it`s intellectual`s dutifully saw fit to deny omnipotence to this supreme craftsman of obfuscation. Rightly so. Sean CLING-ON Brady, has by his own admission played his part which resulted in countless children being abused, and being savagely abused, sexually, by one of Ireland`s most prolific clerical sex abuser`s , Brendan Smyth.

Comment: The Pope and the cardinals know exactly what they are doing. They are not naïve. They understand full well that what they have now set up with the apostolic visitation like asking the mafia to investigate organised crime.The crime scene is totally contaminated. There is no telling the good guys from the bad, there is blood on on all their hands. And they get that. This is an unbridled attempt to muscle their way to redemption. It is a sad reflection of society that, in 2010, the doctrine of the separation of powers can be so comprehensively ignored and violated. Because of the Apostolic Visitation’s declared intent to focus on:

Comment: Because of the Apostolic Visitation’s declared intent to focus on: • boosting the status of priests • improving selection and screening for the priesthood (homosexuals are the problem after all!) and • a push for a return to mass and confession for the faithful, they make obvious their aims and their methods, including:

Comment: .

Comment: they make obvious their aims and their methods, including: • attempt to reinstate priests in their traditional roles, power authority and respect, non-collaboration, no consultation, no questioning • this initiative as a plausible remedy to the “problem” given their self-made diagnosis. By going straight to the solution, they hope to bypass continuing focus on the problems and the issues, steadfastly holding to the view that although widespread, the problem is not systemic or structural — rather a few bad apples spawned in a period of liberal interpretation of Catholicism.

Comment: Nothing short of inviting Desmond Tutu and/or Hans Blix to head up an investigation of the church — including not just Ireland, but Germany, the US, Australia, South America, and other countries ... and Rome — could give any thinking, rational person any reason to believe that the Apostolic Visitation to Ireland is anything other than a smokescreen, a deflection, a PR/spin exercise in image and brand management based on the most cynical, selfish and and self-serving of motives and attitudes.

Comment: test

Comment: The fact`s as they have appeared point to Sean CLING-ON Brady as having engaged in a criminal act of the most heinous nature, and this criminal act was committed when he, Brady, saw silence as the most viable option as opposed to speaking up for, and protecting children. On the face of it and supported by the FACT`S, ANY silence, or omission from those tasked, publicly or otherwise, who are deemed morally responsible in ANY sense for the protection of children and who do NOT speak on such evil`s, leave`s only the FACT that such omission`s or silence can reasonably be construed as tacit approval to ongoing abuse`s as church policy to retain CLERICAL PAEDOPHILE`S provided they are NOT EXPOSED. Angry.

Comment: WHY protect children when the "good name" of the church and it`s asset`s are at stake.? With several high court case`s pending against Brady by former abused children citing his silence and omission which led to their abuse, just how long can Rome and ratzinger stomach Brady`s refusal to go.? Worse still, Sean CLING-ON Brady has expressed, publicly, that he wishe`s to name his successor.?? Is this a DIRECT affront to ratzinger.? Or a mere attempt by Sean to retain "control" of the the SECRETS hidden deep in his CURIA SAFE.? Angry.

Comment: The fact`s as they have appeared point to Sean CLING-ON Brady as having engaged in a criminal act of the most heinous nature, and this criminal act was committed when he, Brady, saw silence as the most viable option as opposed to speaking up for, and protecting children

Comment: On the face of it and supported by the FACT`S, ANY silence, or omission from those tasked, publicly or otherwise, who are deemed morally responsible in ANY sense for the protection of children and who do NOT speak on such evil`s, leave`s only the FACT that such omission`s or silence can reasonably be construed as tacit approval to ongoing abuse`s as church policy to retain CLERICAL PAEDOPHILE`S provided they are NOT EXPOSED. WHY protect children when the "good name" of the church and it`s asset`s are at stake.?

Comment: The fact`s as they have appeared point to Sean CLING-ON Brady as having engaged in a criminal act of the most heinous nature, and this criminal act was committed when he, Brady, saw silence as the most viable option as opposed to speaking up for, and protecting children

Comment: On the face of it and supported by the FACT`S, ANY silence, or omission from those tasked, publicly or otherwise, who are deemed morally responsible in ANY sense for the protection of children and who do NOT speak on such evil`s, leave`s only the FACT that such omission`s or silence can reasonably be construed as tacit approval to ongoing abuse`s as church policy to retain CLERICAL PAEDOPHILE`S provided they are NOT EXPOSED.

Comment: WHY protect children when the "good name" of the church and it`s asset`s are at stake.? With several high court case`s pending against Brady by former abused children citing his silence and omission which led to their abuse, just how long can Rome and ratzinger stomach Brady`s refusal to go.?

Comment: Worse still, Sean CLING-ON Brady has expressed, publicly, that he wishe`s to name his successor.?? Is this a DIRECT affront to ratzinger.? Or a mere attempt by Sean to retain "control" of the the SECRETS hidden deep in his CURIA SAFE.? Angry.

Comment: Testing